Picture of master site plan for The Bend

Thanks to a Lakewood Informer reader and local resident, the site plan for The Bend has been revealed! Contrary to previous reporting, plans have indeed been laid but when discussed in public meetings, those plans were “punted” till later. The north half was not a focus for the City because the planning department granted the developer a phased development status since remediation plans have not been set.


Our reader supplied a full list of instructions to access this information online, which were not provided with Lakewood’s CORA response. To view the plans, the public must register with the eTRAKiT site and login.

The address associated with the project is 11601 W 2nd Pl. In eTRAKiT, search for the following project numbers:

  • FI24-0012 (final plat)
  • SP24-0006 (site plan)
  • ZP24-0005 (preplanning letter)
  • MD24-0001(metro district)

The master plan reveals the area north of 4th Ave that is currently labeled “do not disturb” will eventually have more residential housing than the south end, totaling about 2000, rather than 2000 only on the south end.

There is currently no public plan for remediation or start times while the developer, Lincoln Properties, works to secure the pieces necessary to get a metropolitan district approved. The metro district will be used as a funding mechanism, rather than a service mechanism, and nothing can proceed without funding.

The difference between a funding mechanism and service mechanism is important because metropolitan districts are granted government privileges based on providing public services.

To get any kind of infrastructure built on the landfill, the site will need remediation. The safety of the future residents would dictate that full site remediation be completed before building. It’s possible the profits from the south side will be used to fund the north side, or be used to repay developer investment before moving on to the more costly north side.

A bank or private investors might demand remediation first since the success and cost of remediation will dictate overall project success. Federal grants are available to assist, which in this case is only right since the federal government caused the contamination. State grants are also available, many of which are pass-through for federal funds.

Much of the rest of the funding will come through Lakewood’s Urban Renewal financing and metro district bonds. With Lakewood-approved, government-backed guarantees through metro districts, the developer can privatize the benefits while socializing the risks. The benefit to the public will be the ability to live on this revitalized land.

In this case, there is no public living there and asking for a democratic vote on public services. Those future residents are depending on the city to represent their interests. There is no direct representation for taxation.


Base Salary graphic

Lakewood resident Bob Adams brings receipts! Lakewood Informer news stated that City Manager Cathy Hodgson made a base salary of $280,000, as stated during the December 19, 2022 City Council meeting.

Mr. Adams made an open records request to find out that the City Manager’s 2024 annual base salary was $335,949. This does not include benefits.

The adjustment could be year-over-year increases, which would be a 20% increase over two years. It could also be that the original $280,000 stated during council meetings was incorrect, if so, my apologies.

Many City Councilors justify this high salary based on Manager Hodgson’s 15 years of experience. There is, understandably, no public discussion on personnel matters. However, the review used to be tied to a metric like resident satisfaction. With declining satisfaction, the resident survey came out with less frequency and is no longer a performance metric.


From Bob Adams, 2023, open records request from Lakewood:

Screenshot of excel sheet showing salary

Screenshot of the Kim Monson Show podcast

Lakewood’s own Ramey Johnson was on the Kim Monson Show, KLZ 560 AM, Wednesday, March 19, to discuss several statewide bills that could cost taxpayers money.

As members of the Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT), Monson and Johnson discuss House Bills 25-1211 and 25-1297.

Regarding HB25-1211, Monson said, “I think this House Bill 25-1211, tap fees imposed by special districts, this is big government and politicians, to me, it looks like getting in bed together.”

Johnson replies, “Yes, it is, Kim. But more than that, this one is a gift to the developers. It’s a developer’s dream come true”

HB25-1211 is Rep. Rebekah Stewart’s bill that tries to force special districts to lower fees to accomplish her surplus housing strategy, as reported by Lakewood Informer news

HB25-1297 is for a Health Insurance Affordability Enterprise. Monson said, “Whenever you see the word enterprise, that means they’re trying to take money out from the calculations for the TABOR refunds, your money coming back to you.” The bill talks about new fees.

Johnson responds, “There’s no such thing as fees. That means a tax.” She explains that the bill authorizes an increase in health insurance affordability fee.

Listen to the whole interview, starting around the 18-minute mark.


From a resident with a question. Thanks for sharing!

According to the Jefferson County website: https://www.jeffco.us/4887/Federal-Impact-Updates

“In 2023 the county [Jefferson] received about $105 million in federal revenue from approximately 130 different awards. The county relies on these federal dollars to provide a broad range of critical services such as food assistance, early childhood education, highway safety, crime victim assistance, employment services, child support, medical assistance, emergency management, and preventative health services. Additionally, in 2023 we administered about $110 million in direct federal assistance to our community. Once our 2024 audit is complete, we will have more recent numbers.” 

Question: Why are Jeffco County Commissioners risking the loss of $215 million dollars in essential federal funds to openly defy federal law by not cooperating with federal immigration law and an Executive Order to eliminate DEI offices? 

County answer: “We will continue to provide essential services and resources to our community and are in the process of identifying strategies to do that in the event that we lose funding.” 

In other words, RAISE OUR TAXES AGAIN. 

Voters in Jefferson County were not allowed to vote on implementing DEI in the County nor could we vote on defying federal immigration law for the County to protect illegal immigrants nor vote on defying the DEI Executive Order. These decisions are the sole responsibility of the County Commissioners and their handlers.


Please share any answers you hear from the county as to whether they will comply with federal direction in order to receive federal money.

City Council Members Jacob Labure and Paula Nystrom asked for equal representation on the Budget and Audit Board, January 27, 2025. They were denied. Only three wards will be represented on the Board.

The Budget and Audit Board is vitally important for accountability. Many policies and programs that staff originate are never disclosed to the public. They only show up in funding requests. And as evidenced by the 2024 vote to de-TABOR, city staff is not often turned down.

Councilor LaBure was involved in the last rewrite of the Budget Board. LaBure fought hard to get each ward representation on the Board, saying it was common practice to not only have five Councilors on the Board but to allow any Council Member to come and make comments.

Now the current Board doesn’t even allow comments.

Councilors Shahrezaei and Mayott-Guerrero both said that allowing that many Councilors, as worked for years, would now be unmanageable. Shahrezaei pointed out that at one point, a single councilor made 37 questions to staff and that amount of work was too hard.

There is no general rule for how many questions the paid city staff should answer as part of being publicly accountable for a multi-million-dollar budget.

In 2024, when Mayor Strom downsized committee sizes, then-Councilor Rich Olver was upset to be removed. Strom explained that she thought she was doing him a favor because he often didn’t have time. Olver was not present at the meeting for the initial appointments to protest. But his argument resonated with Councilor Dave Rein who supported increasing representation.

Councilor Low also supported the proposal saying, “Budget is one of the most important things we do. Ward 3 should have representation.”

2025 Council Members on the Budget Board are:

  • Jeslin Shahrezaei, Ward 1
  • Isabel Cruz, Ward 2
  • Dave Rein, Ward 4

Scorecard: Allow Equal Representation

Strom: Nay

Shahrezaei: Nay

Sinks: Nay

Mayott-Guerrero: Nay

Cruz: Nay

Low: Aye

Rein: Aye

LaBure: Aye

Nystrom: Aye


Lakewood Informer


Resident generated news for Lakewood, Colorado.

Subscribe


© 2022 Lakewood Informer | All Rights Reserved
Designed by Mile High Web Designs