Lakewood City Council unanimously decided to put the zoning code up for a vote on a special election on April 7, 2026. Both pro-zoning and anti-zoning advocates requested the special election. Both sides believe they have the support of the people.
The decision to put the zoning code on the ballot was not about the zoning code. The issue was whether City Council would listen to the people. City Council rushed to approve a new zoning code without a public discussion of the underlying densification decision. The actual changes were a different discussion than the broader Comprehensive Plan or “affordable housing” discussion. Once people started to understand zoning densification impacts, there was a rising number of complaints. City Council Members discounted these voices as a “small minority.”
A year later, City Council seems to honestly believe that the thousands of residents who signed a referendum petition are not only a small minority, but also wrong and misinformed.
Both sides asked for a special election to prove they are right.
The danger for all involved is the tendency to build an echo chamber of support. City Council has built a strong echo chamber to support progressive policies. When those policies are opposed by residents, Councilors say all their policies were supported in order to get elected.
Support for a person is different than support for a specific policy.
This is same kind of false conflation that occurred during the zoning discussion. City Council said people wanted affordable housing, so therefore Council believed everyone would support a zoning code that turned suburban Lakewood into a more urban area.
Two different things.
Most of City Council was elected without strong resident support. Instead, as reported in Lakewood Informer news, they were:
The current City Council did not originally campaign on zoning changes, so their election is not evidence in support for zoning.
In contrast, the petitioners did extensive education and resident outreach on zoning details. They raised support for a voters’ veto of urbanized zoning.
One resident noticed that every item on the agenda demonstrated a problem with transparency. Comments like this point to a chronic and systemic problem in Lakewood.
A comment from Lakewood resident Jon Goldman described how Lakewood’s outreach failed to give accurate information and listen to feedback (see slide pictured below).
Listening is hard work. Being in the same room and saying “I hear you but…” is not the same thing.
People signed the petition to repeal zoning once they learned what the all negative impacts of the new code. That was well after the time that City Council said everyone knew and agreed with the new policy.
Obviously, Council was wrong then. The question is, are they still wrong now?
And a second question, will the big outside money that got Council elected work against the residents now?
Will Lakewood residents support affordable housing at the cost of their chosen suburban investment?
