Lakewood Informer

Resident generated news about Lakewood, Colorado

Lakewood Informer

Resident generated news about Lakewood, Colorado

Uncategorized

Concerns and Comments for Whippoorwill Dr

Guest Submission from Toni Riggio, sent to City of Lakewood Planning, Engineering, Traffic  and Ward 1 members  This letter is in response to the Subdivision Notification Letter received by mail by the City of Lakewood on 5/3/24. There is a multi-family development that is proposed at 1515 Whippoorwill Dr (Ward 1) with the Ingress/Egress  at Youngfield St, 15h Pl and Youngfield Dr and I am writing in opposition to that access point based on the following reasons: Concerns and Comments for Case# FI23-0016 and S23-0025/1515 Whippoorwill Dr Proposed Ingress/Egress  is where 3 streets come together 1-      Youngfield Street:  is an increasingly busy corridor. Traveling South requires a full stop at the blind curve to see oncoming traffic before turning onto 15th Pl. Traveling North has low visibility as you turn right onto 15th Pl. 2-      15th Place: Per Aldridge Transportation Consultants recent memo in etrakit,   is “a steep 10%  grade” uphill as you turn in. This street is a no outlet/ not a thru street that serves 13 homes. 3-      Youngfield Drive:  is currently a narrow dirt road, not a through street with limited width to expand to the required 36’ for Mixed Use zoning. Lakewood has made an exception for 28’ which makes the entirety of the Road a fire lane per Metro West Fire Dept. The neighbors have proposed the Ingress/Egress to be at Colfax Ave for a myriad of safety issues and concerns which are highlighted in this document. The ongoing meetings the neighbors and Applewood Valley Assoc have had with both the developer and the City of Lakewood to have access at Colfax Ave have yielded little results to date. This plot of land was originally zoned Residential (R-1A) and in 2012 rezoned to Mixed Use Suburban, because it backs Colfax Ave. We were given a few reasons why the entrance and exit can’t be on W. Colfax; however, the 2014 plans from the City of Lakewood mandated the access to the site to be at W. Colfax Ave, for the same developer and site.  In 2023 the City of Lakewood allowed a Multi-family Residential unit to have access from W. Colfax. This site is across the street from this proposed Williams Point site. Further, based on the CDOT referral, it appears that CDOT is not opposed to the development to be accessed through W. Colfax Avenue as they note in their referral “No access is being proposed on Colfax. If access to Colfax is proposed in the future, the City of Lakewood is the Issuing Authority, so the discussion for access will need to begin with Lakewood.” This 1.6-acre plot has challenging topography, is crammed with utilities; electric, gas, water, sewer and communications. It has been owned by the current Developer for over 20 yrs. It wasn’t until they received a 9% tax credit from CHFA that they were able to get green lit for max density housing. The CHFA funding was approved based on half-truths of being adjacent to a bus stop and community outreach and acceptance, both which were requirements. None of the immediate 13 homeowners to the proposed project were ever notified prior to this grant. Also, the bus stop, while adjacent to the property, has no direct access from the development without walking/biking .8 miles  down a 10% grade on W. 15th Pl, without sidewalks or street lights, out to Youngfield St up to W Colfax Ave which has high traffic, steep grades and no sidewalk, creating safety, ADA concerns and other complexities. Further, employment opportunities, schools and parks are between 1 to 1.5 miles away There is a proposed retaining wall and infrastructure to hold up Colfax Ave which will prevent direct access to and from the public transportation from the proposed development site. (Note: Per CHFA requirements the access to public transportation needs to be within a half mile.) A traffic study  by Aldridge Transportation Consultants, estimates a daily 300+ car trips entering and exiting. The proposed project will have (44) 1- 3-bedroom units with 70 parking spaces. This will result in overflow parking on the fire lane and existing neighborhood, where little enforcement will be available or take even place. The Aldridge traffic study does not take into account the addition of Lutheran Hospital employing 2200 people and many other high-density housing going in nearby. Also, traffic is re-routed to Youngfield St whenever there is an accident on the parallel I-70 highway. This creates bumper to bumper traffic on Youngfield St. each time. The most recent memo from Aldridge fails to address traffic approaching 15th Pl travelling South on Youngfield St and turning left onto 15th Pl. We are extremely concerned about emergency access back to our neighborhood, as we have had two fires within 10yrs. We are in a special high wind district, which was recently cited by Metro West Fire Dept to be the leading cause of dry brush fires, that is no longer seasonal, but year round. The existing neighborhood was built in the 50’s. The 2 roads 15th Pl a cul-de-sac and Whippoorwill Dr. a dead end. In most sections, the widths are 21-22’ no curb and gutter and drainage ditches on both sides and each with roadside mail delivery and trash pickup.  This is where overflow parking will occur but is not adequate to receive the additional cars and would make it very difficult for emergency or fire crews to reach the existing neighborhood. The neighbors in this area have witnessed pedestrians falling in the street while walking out of Youndfield Dr onto 15th Pl steep grade next to Youngfield St  in winter conditions. There have been a multitude of cars  getting stuck and/or sliding down 15th Pl to Youngfield St with snow and ice conditions. This has also included delivery/mail trucks, City of Lakewood snow plows getting stuck in the ditches at the intersection of 15th Pl and Youngfield St When approaching entrance to 15th Pl in the snow, you need momentum and speed to get up the 10% grade requiring 4-wheel drive vehicles to be successful. While having this grade may not be uncommon in our mountainous State, this is a contentious intersection with the convergence of these three streets. 2 with steep grades, 1 an increasingly busy street with questionable visibility in both directions. We

Lakewood Agrees to More Expensive Construction to Make Housing More Affordable

Lakewood has approved construction of Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs) that are up to 1400 square feet large, bigger than the original house in some areas, in an effort to “remove barriers” to affordability. ADUs are sometimes known as “mother-in-law” suites, a separate apartment that can be rented out on your primary residence. Councilor Stewart made the original request to research increasing ADU use in Lakewood, over a year before the motion passed on June 10, 2024. The two main barriers are the concept of single-family zoning (R1 vs R2) and infrastructure costs. By passing these revisions, Lakewood has densified single-family zoning into dual-family zoning, for every property that can fit an additional dwelling unit onto the land. According to research conducted by the Planning Commission, most people say they do not build an ADU after they find out they would need to pay more for additional water and sewer infrastructure. There seems to be a common belief that because there is room on the land, there should be extra room in the pipes, which is not true. Rather than acknowledge that water districts set those infrastructure fees, Planning Commissioner and Chair Kolkmeier suggested doubling the size of an allowable ADU, from 700 sq. ft. to 1400 sq. ft., so that the infrastructure cost would be a lesser percentage. So overall costs would go up in the name of affordability. Custom-built ADUs are already expensive compared to commercial apartment buildings that are mass produced. However, an economic analysis of construction costs or rental profits was not researched. Among the ADU proponents, including Councilor Stewart and Shahrezaei, there seemed to be an understanding that someone who went to the expense of building an ADU would be happy to rent the unit at- or below-market price, to a family member or friend. Others, including Councilor Nystrom and Olver, questioned whether these units would be available for investors, therefore not guaranteeing it would be “affordable”. Nystrom said she was in favor of creating more ownership situations, not rental situations. Olver quoted the real estate mantra “Location location location” and said that creating more supply will not lower housing prices in a desirable location such as Lakewood. Olver’s point has been proved because Lakewood has excess supply yet housing costs have not come down. Councilor David Rein proposed an amendment to make owner-occupancy required. The motion failed on a 5-5 vote, with the ayes being Councilors Rein, Olver, Nystrom, LaBure and Mayor Strom. The nays were Councilors: Shahrezaei, Low, Mayott-Guerrero, and Sinks. (Councilor Cruz absent).   Without this amendment, the ADU and property can be used for two, full-time rental properties, making them attractive to investors. Planning Commission Chair Kolkmeier explained that even though these revisions might not increase ADU construction, our current ordinance strangles growth and our residential development is in a death spiral but did not offer evidence. He argues the changes are one way to bring back families and possibly schools but he did not explain how if he believes the changes would be largely ineffective. No one offered evidence, just beliefs that some kind of change by someone was necessary. Even though housing may be more expensive with these changes, the goal of “liberalizing” the code was achieved. Councilor Sinks pointed out that these revisions seem like a work around to getting a property subdivided. The property could not be subdivided for separate ownership. A property with two houses would be much more expensive to sell. If these changes are successful in increasing ADUs, the Councilors who voted for ADUs will be responsible for increasing property prices. The other barrier, infrastructure costs, was discussed at some length during Planning Commission and Council meetings. The infrastructure fees are set by water districts individually and are not under city control. Rather than acknowledging this fact, Planning Commission Chair Kolkmeier and Councilor Roger Low enlisted the help of State Representative Chris DeGruy-Kennedy to change state law, asking to restrict a district’s ability to set infrastructure costs. This would make existing customers responsible for paying for necessary capacity increases to accommodate new building. That proposed legislation, HB24-1463, was largely defeated. No one at the state or city level explained, or even seemed to know, what the infrastructure fee would pay for, despite explanations available from resident water districts (see below). Councilor Jacob LaBure picked up the gauntlet of problematic costs by suggesting the creation of a housing fund that the city can use to pay for people’s infrastructure costs. This suggestion was heard before during meetings on Strategic Housing. Lakewood has already subsidized tap fees before through the Community Grant Program. The State of Colorado also passed new legislation regarding ADUs this year. That bill, HB24-1152, will require that Lakewood remove owner-occupancy provisions. However, as a home-rule city, Lakewood always has the option to challenge state law for the right to local government.  As Lakewood attorney Lauren Stanec said, “if the city decided they wanted to comply with the state ADU bill….”, presumably meaning that as a home-rule city, Lakewood always has the option to fight for its right to local government. The city could remove the owner-occupancy provision now. Lakewood did not, and passed all changes as originally proposed by the Planning commission. Scorecard: Expanding Additional Dwelling Unit Possibilities in all R1 zones Strom: Aye Olver: Nay Mayott-Guerrero: Aye Stewart: Aye Rein: Aye Shahrezaei: Aye Labure: Aye Nystrom: Nay Low: Aye Cruz: absent Sinks: Aye

Lakewood Crime for June

Maps clipped from Community Crime Map for the month of June, 2024, in Lakewood, Colorado. Note: Statistics seem to vary slightly per application (density map versus event map). This website is very user friendly and can be zoomed in for better detail although exact locations are changed for privacy. Compare to June of 2023 below. Note that comparison is done visually since numbers for “Lakewood” include parts of of Denver, which doubles the number of crimes.

Garage Sale to Benefit Applewood for Responsible Development

Changes to the zoning code in 2012 and new exemptions from the City of Lakewood are causing Applewood residents to fear for their property, road safety, parking and emergency circumstances. Lakewood will allow a narrow access road through the neighborhood to serve a multi-family, affordable housing development rather than route traffic to Colfax. Residents have organized a neighborhood garage sale for Friday and Saturday, June 28-29, to raise funds for the cause. Please stop by to support them and see the site location for yourself. Applewood for Responsible Development: Oppose Irresponsible Development at Whippoorwill Dr – See the Change.org Petition The property was originally zoned as residential. The roads and stormwater runoff are appropriate for residential use. The city could insist on development that is consistent with the neighborhood and existing roads, as per ordinance. To do that, the city would have to follow it’s own advice from 2014 and route multi-family traffic to Colfax, which is right behind the property. Instead, these residents will be forced to bear adverse affects of development that could easily be mitigated by following existing ordinance. Just like the residents advocating against the Belmar Park development, Applewood residents are organizing and hiring a lawyer. Your financial and moral support Friday and Saturday could make a difference. For more details, see their Change.org petition Garage Sale: June 28-29 at W 15th Place and Youngfield Dr. (Nearest address is 1525 Whippoorwill Dr)

Fresh Peaches are Coming July 13th

Promoted post from the Fruit Truck FRESH FRUIT FROM THE ORCHARD TO YOUR FAMILY! The Fruit Truck will be in Lakewood on July 13 Summer Fruit 2024: peaches, cherries, blueberries, blackberries, apricots, and pecans. Sears Parking Lot, 10785 W Colfax Ave4:30 pm – 5:00 pm $45 for 20lb box first come first served Cash or check at the truck Dedicated to bringing the freshest and most delicious fruit straight from the orchard to your family.  Find out more here

We Know What’s Good For You – Metro Districts

Guest Post by Alex Plotkin One of the fundamental jobs that a government has is to ensure that businesses act ethically.  In theory, the government, local, state or federal will pass regulations which keep corporations from exposing thousands of residents to cancer-causing chemicals.  In theory, having learned just how abusive metro districts can be, a government would, maybe, outlaw them? Some cities, such as Longmont and Westminster, have taken such a stand but Lakewood is still working on ways to enable formation of metro districts. Metro Districts are a type of special district especially for developers. It is not a government of the people, by the people for the people, because THERE ARE NO PEOPLE. There is only a developer, making deals with himself to have future people pay increasing amounts of taxes and fees. Not surprisingly, granting governmental immunity and taxing abilities to a developer who is only accountable to himself, has caused problems  (see this district with toxic sludge for a recent example.) On May 6th 2024, Lakewood City Council had a workshop to study a proposed ordinance on Metro Districts in Lakewood.  The ordinance was first proposed in 2021 and it was immediately obvious that it’s more of a “see, we did something for the good of the public”, while allowing the big money they shill for to continue to make profit, at any cost. City Council Members seemed very aware of all the pitfalls of metro districts, asking pertinent questions about how Lakewood could possibly limit some of the abuses, while at the same time neglecting limiting districts altogether. Allegedly, according the Director of Planning, Travis Parker, the need to implement “something” was due to the recently passed Senate Bills 21-262 and 23-110: In reality, it would be better to do nothing and simply follow the state’s statutes, instead of crafting a faulty ordinance, designed to offer the developers a plethora of loopholes to perpetuate further financial abuses (at least, in Lakewood). Furthermore, when the Lakewood City Council tried to push through the same, flawed, piece of legislature in 2021, its numerous flaws were covered in great detail by Mr. John Henderson, who, for years, has been leading the fight against Metro District abuse in Colorado.  Mr. Henderson sent a detailed analysis of the proposed ordinance with specific areas of concern pointed out to the Council. There is a narrative, pushed by Metro District lobbyists, that metro districts make housing more affordable.  We are still waiting for a logical, three sentence (or less) explanation, as to how a house that costs $500,000 and has $8,000 worth of mill levies is more affordable than a house that costs $530,000 and has $4000 worth of mill levies per year.  In this situation, the $500,000 house has extra mill levies in a metro district, rather than the upfront cost of the infrastructure. The $30,000 decrease in cost is financed through the developer, who earns interest. If the resident bought the house for $530,000, their mortgage would pay that cost off in 8 years of equivalent mill levy payments, but the resident will be paying that levy forever. Decades of $4,000 per year, per house, in extra fees that go directly to the developer. The extra mill levies do not go toward schools, fire departments and other services normally paid for by taxes. Instead, they go towards the basic infrastructure that usually comes with your house but you pay for decades to come.  And those mill levies could go up even more, without residents having a say, because there are no residents involved from the beginning to be fairly represented. Only the developer will vote for the mill levy other people will pay. The reality is that paying the total house cost through a mortgage is more affordable for residents. One of the many claims is that the metro districts make development possible (and affordable).  For who?  For those who need the housing or for those who will profit, immensely, from selling it?  Most other states in the U.S. do not utilize metro districts to finance development.  A developer, well, develops the land.  A builder purchases the developed land from the developer.  A builder builds the house and sells it to a buyer for a profit.  End of transaction.  They do not continue to collect cash from the buyer for decades to come. Metro districts are not mandated to provide affordable housing as a condition to receiving government status. Developers do not pretend to provide affordable housing. Instead, some claim that metro districts make housing more affordable than traditional development. The financial difference is upfront costs versus costs stretched out over time and what interest rate you are getting. Typical mill rates levied are the equivalent of 18% interest, which is more than the average home loan. Lakewood City Council, who recently has moved general public comment to the “back of line” to make it even harder for the public to speak up during the city council meetings, DID NOT invite anyone to represent the public concerns to the workshop.  Stories of flat-out financial abuse are well-documented but experts known to the city were not invited. The city did, however, invite the Metro District top lobbyist, Kristy Pollard from the Metro District Education Coalition.  She was the sole outsider to answer questions  MDEC’s hypocrisy was covered by Mr. Henderson as well. One of the city councilors, Rich Olver, did voice a concern of “who invited this person, while not having anyone in the room to represent the other side of the argument.” One.  The rest of the councilors proceeded under the forgone conclusion of “well, we gotta pass something.”  The truth is – you don’t.  You could, simply, make metro districts illegal. Councilor Nystrom ardently kept stating that more disclosure was always better, while Councilor Shahrezaei kept saying that the city will most likely not be able to enforce the failures to properly disclose and notify the potential buyers of a property within a Metro District.  While Councilor Sinks

Judge: Lakewood police must disclose blurred body-cam footage of officers shooting and killing 17-year-old

Cross-post from By Jeffrey A. Roberts, Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition A judge Friday ordered the Lakewood Police Department to release blurred body-worn camera footage of officers shooting and killing a 17-year-old crime suspect in March 2023. The city withheld the video from Scripps News journalist Lori Jane Gliha, contending it was required to do so by the Colorado Childrens Code — which restricts the disclosure of most juvenile records — and privacy provisions in the Law Enforcement Integrity Act, passed by the legislature in 2020 following the killing of George Floyd. But Jefferson County District Court Judge Chantel Contiguglia found that the footage must be released under the four-year-old statute. “I don’t see that there is a choice,” Contiguglia said, ruling from the bench during a morning hearing. “I see that it has to be disclosed with a plain reading of the law.” Read more from CFOIC…

Opinion: Clapping handled as a threat, not active heckling

Mayor Strom’s explanation during the May 15th Council meeting demonstrated first-class political spin for why the April 22 meeting was adjourned early. For those active citizens who have shown up to protest at City Council meetings and have been told they “must refrain from audible support”, Mayor Strom and Mayor Pro Tem Shahrezaei issued a slap in the face. They threatened people for clapping between speakers but allowed interruptions to a speaking Councilor. Then they both claimed that security concerns led the Mayor to adjourn the meeting early on April 22, rather than the active heckling that they allowed. The reality is that no safety concerns were cited at the time and there were no efforts to tame the crowd. Instead, there were people interrupting the Councilors they disagreed with. Councilor Shahrezaei made the motion to adjourn the meeting and said “We’re done with you, Councilor Olver.” No matter the explanation offered by Mayor Strom, Strom was not the leader of this drama. Instead, she followed Shahrezaei. Neither of them asked the people who were heckling and questioning Olver to please quiet down. Mayor Strom explains at the beginning of each public comment session that there should be no “audible support” from the public. In the past, one or two people clapping between speakers has been enough for Mayor Strom to threaten to recess the meeting. “We will be recessing if  we continue to have clapping.  Let’s please make sure that we can respect everybody’s ability to listen.” – Mayor Strom, November 27, 2023 On April 22nd, neither Strom nor Shahrezaei threatened to recess the meeting due to disruptions. Instead, the meeting was shut down because one Councilor was making a contradictory opinion on a nationally divisive issue and another Councilor disagreed. See the video showing the two different examples. Strom argues that the security concerns weren’t visible on video. That may be true, but a call for order would have been visible and that was conspicuously absent. Not one mention of safety, security or order was made at the time. Watch the video to see for yourself. The safety claim was pure political spin, first reported by a resident who questioned Shahrezaei at a ward meeting. The claim is a insult to residents who have had to endure the condescending attitude towards “audible support” in past meetings. Not only was it an insulting, false claim, it was a step backwards for women. Women are better than having to resort to hysterical claims of safety to justify their actions. Women can be strong leaders and competently run meetings, even when their counterparts have opinions they disagree with. Lakewood residents deserve that strength in their elected officials. “You wanna keep arguing here or are you going to listen?” Olver responds to multiple comments from the crowd, April 22, 2024. Losing control of the meeting may be forgivable; it was an unusual situation. Spinning the story later was a disservice to everyone, especially to Councilor Olver, who did not get an apology for being rudely cut off. The Councilors who did not get an opportunity to speak and all the community members who want a transparent and accountable government deserve an apology they did not get. We all deserved an apology, not spin.

Lender sells $60 million note on Wadsworth apartment project

Cross-post from Justin Wingerter, BusinessDen A $60 million blunder along Wadsworth Boulevard that was all but abandoned in January is now a stable, $117 million apartment project and two-thirds complete, its receiver said. Aspen Heights Partners, a Texas developer, broke ground in 2020 on a 352-unit apartment complex at 1225 Wadsworth in Lakewood, with plans to finish it by the end of 2022. Amenities were to include a heated pool, dog park, bike repair shop and golf simulator. That didn’t happen. Instead, millions of dollars in mechanic’s liens piled up and Truist Bank, which loaned $59.9 million to the project, tried suing to get its money back. “Truist has become aware of significant cost overruns, scheduling delays and defects in the course of construction of the project,” the Atlanta-based bank wrote in a lawsuit that it filed in Golden in January. “Additionally, work on the project has come to a standstill due to infighting between the two primary members” of Aspen Heights’ development team. Read more from BusinessDen…

Update on homelessness and immigration housing.

Guest Post from Joan from Lakewood Week of June 1 – personal update on homelessness and immigration housing. So this week I was invited to two different meetings with two different perspectives on homelessness, immigration, and affordable housing. This is my perception of both meetings. Meeting number one 6/4 was the Common Sense Institute (CSI) meeting, titled Egg and the Economy. The CSI is a non-partisan issues researching group that has been on the scene of Colorado politics for the last year. Their breakfast was held at the AMG Dome in Greenwood Village. There was a presentation on CSI latest research on migrants and homelessness by CSI’s Director of Policy & Research, DJ Summers and then he moderated a fascinating panel with Adam Paul (Denver Mayors Office), Paul Scudo (Step Denver) & Heidi Williams with (Metro Mayors Caucus). The panel presented two diffing views on homelessness. Step Denver stated that 70 percent of homeless are substance addiction victims. There were other  fun facts from a report that CSI had released. You can see this report at Common Sense Institutehttps://commonsenseinstituteco.orgCommon Sense Institute and then go to the menu and choose local issues. Look for the report “A Snapshot of the Metro Denver Homeless Ecosystem in 2023”. and the fact that stood out to me was that between 2021 and 2023 the amount spent on a homeless person grew from $30,000 per year to $60,000 per year. And that in fall of 2023, Denver was ranked #5 in the nation with fifth largest homeless population. The panel was quite lively and one point that came out was Adam Paul statement that there was a plan to house 3000 more homeless within the next year and half.  And because the funding for Housing First came from the Federal Government there can not be any stipulations on the housing like job training, or chores like bed making which is the accountability piece of the Step Denver program.  The Breakfast Wrap was the worst part of the meeting but the very real question and answer session after the panel and presentation was exceptional. I can recommend following this group and attending their next meeting Thursday June 27 on the Fentanyl crisis.  The second meeting 6/6 was the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners and Municipalities’ Quarterly Breakfast. This meeting was the County Commissioners, Mayors, and City Council members. There was no interaction with the public and we were asked to move to seats next to wall and I suspect we were not supposed to eat breakfast. But we did anyway. The bagel sandwich was much better fare than what I had at the CSI meeting.  The main topic of the meeting was the JeffCo Housing Advocacy Blueprint. Although Sara Reynolds did not share the plan there was a presentation by the Colorado Gives Foundation about how they had done a survey (most people contacted were in favor of affordable housing), created jeffcoadvocacynetwork.org, and training a group of 15 advocates. They also requested if anyone was running for an office that they contact them for education on affordable housing as there was a lot misunderstanding on this issue. It appears that the City of Lakewood donated to this foundation.  They had homeless updates, ballot initiatives, and individual city reports. I am sorry that I do not have names with all the reports but no introductions were   made at the beginning of the meeting.  Arvada is still looking at building a navigation center similar to the center in Lakewood.  WheatRidge the opening of a 50 units facility on June 14 with mental health services for youth.  There is a new project Lutheran Campus Renovation. And with this is a ballot initiative in November to raise the building height  levels that can be constructed (not exactly sure what this was about) Lakewood had the largest number of city council members and City Manager Kathy Hodgson present. Wendy Strom gave a few sentences about the Navigation Center and mentioned that Prop 123 would be on the ballot as Lakewood was trying to DeBruce TABOR. There was a 20 million dollar grant given to the City of Lakewood to do a restructuring of the Highway at 6th and Wadsworth. There is a housing advocacy committee and Wendy Strom and Kathy Hodgson are on the committee. And the City of Lakewood is a finalist for the All American City Contest. Congratulations.  Westminster noted they had a pothole Palooza and filed 3000 potholes.  Golden talked about the new dorm Colorado Mines was building and all the construction that is going on with Golden.  Mountain View is having a proposition on the November ballot to make the city a strong manager model over the strong mayor model that they have now.  Edgewater bragged about last weekend’s annual Pride Month parade.  Littleton was absent.  The last report was an update from the county commissioners. They were grateful for the regional outlook and called for more cooperation within the county on housing. There was a mention that they are still up in the air about asking for keeping the Tabor refund to fill the holes in the budget. They are talking about what they would have to do to have a balanced budget next year. Raise taxes. Cut services. This is still up in the air as it is rumored the survey shows the win on this is too close to call.  The next quarterly breakfast is September 5, 2023. Check the calendar for details closer to the event. 

Scroll to top