Lakewood Informer

Resident generated news about Lakewood, Colorado

Lakewood Informer

Resident generated news about Lakewood, Colorado

Uncategorized

Lakewood Supports Migrants Becoming Workers and Residents

Lakewood Mayor Wendi Strom supported new migrants becoming “proud workers and residents of Colorado” by approving a letter from the Metro Mayors Caucus. A copy of the letter itself was provided by the Caucus, not by Lakewood, and is shown below. Unlike other legislative positions, this letter was not discussed in public and was not subject to Council committee vote. However, the letter does specifically state that it represents community members, not just the Mayor’s personal opinion. The letter requests three things: fast-tracked work permits, legal services, and federal funding.  Border enforcement is not mentioned, nor is removing Colorado’s sanctuary status.  Read the letter below. Work authorizations and federal funding are parts of what people know as “immigration reform” rather than what people know as “border security”. Recent community meetings show that Lakewood residents are very interested in the migrant issue and would like a say in these decisions. However, instead of publicly discussing the issue, Mayor Strom approved the letter while residents were conducting their own community meetings in preparation to hear what actions Lakewood planned on taking on February 12. Resident voices are being signed in support of this federal issue, whether they approve or not, with no public explanation from their local representative. The letter itself is not available on the Metro Mayors Caucus nor Lakewood’s website. When asked for the letter, Lakewood responded that the letter and associated emails would cost $134 to provide. Fortunately, the Metro Mayors Caucus released the letter to Kim Monson, host of the Kim Monson Show, who heard about the letter directly from Strom. The letter is only signed by the Mayor of Golden, as representative of the Metro Mayor Caucus. Only 26 of the 38 member communities needed to approve the letter on behalf of them all. Which communities voted yea or nay is not listed but Mayor Strom’s email shows that she joined in “signing on to the letter…. in support” of these actions on behalf of Lakewood. Note: If you are not in Lakewood, ask your representative if they voted in favor of these measures This letter of support was not mentioned on Lakewood’s website regarding migrant misinformation. There is no other webpage on migrant information. The letter was not mentioned during the February 12 meeting when residents were assembled to hear news about Lakewood, Colorado migrant actions. Read the letter for yourself below.

Nonprofit purchases Colorado motel, expands homeless services: “The most expensive thing we can do is nothing”

Cross post from Karen Morfitt, CBS Colorado From the article… “They purchased the former motel- as they work to build a continuum of services in the area and is just a piece of the strategic plan the county has been shaping for years. “When people are left languishing on the street, they are kind of in survival mode. It’s hard to pull yourself out of that homelessness,” Ginsburg said. The location, which is close to RTD, and other services is why many already struggling to find affordable housing were paying weekly to live in the motel. Amos Apencer has a month or so before it will no longer be an option.” Read more from CBS Colorado… Read more from the original posting: Recovery Works Secures Former Motel in Lakewood

Extremists in Lakewood Bully City Council

After the February 12 City Council meeting, Lakewood City Council Member Rebekah Stewart sent out a campaign email, saying “Despite extremist attempts to bully and intimidate us out of investing in this critical resource, I stood up with my colleagues for our community and our shared values.” Who are these extremists who would bully and intimidate Lakewood City Council? Does she mean the hundreds of residents who came to the meeting and the many who spoke? Is everyone who disagrees with Council decisions extreme? Which ones are not? Are all these Lakewood residents bullies? Can we assume these people are not extremists since they are included in her email: Is your voice being heard in Lakewood? Read Stewarts campaign email here for full context.

A Poisoned Pill Passed: The Strategic Housing Plan

City Council Member Rich Olver was the only nay vote for the Strategic Housing Plan, which passed on February 12, 2024. He claimed it was a poisoned pill because it contained provisions that did not have public support, such as using abandoned school buildings for homeless services. Neighborhood associations came to voice their concern that stakeholders were not included. The associations were more concerned about the development strategies than the unhoused strategies. The associations’ comments show that although the plan was billed as affordable housing, there were two distinct pieces: more high-density development and plans for the homeless. Councilor Sophia Mayott-Guerrero said the Housing Plan will work “hand-in-hand” with the Navigation Center. These items are all interconnected to give Lakewood the same framework that cities like Denver use to deal with the unhoused. The message from February 12 was that a majority of Council want the plan passed; however, there was no clear consensus as to what the plan means. Councilor Sinks said it would be good to have a roadmap to follow. Others spoke of discussions still to come. Councilor Low promoted strategies for eviction protection, Additional Dwelling Unit expansion and directly funding housing. Mayor Pro Tem Shahrezaei said, “The action at this point is to adopt this framework. Nobody is agreeing tonight to all these strategies.  We are agreeing that there is a need for affordable housing.” Agreeing to a need for affordable housing does not require even one page. The Strategic Housing Plan is 156 pages of strategies. Which strategies Council did not agree to was not discussed.  Instead of approving all strategies in one motion, each strategy could be adopted by separate motion after further discussion. In fact, many strategies will need to be adopted by modifying ordinance to implement. Olver said this plan is not making more affordable housing, it is not stopping corporate land speculation, or increasing home ownership possibilities. He asked for more time to study, but no other Councilor agreed. Other Council Members had agreed to pass the plan at a previous study session. Shahrezaei pointed out that the Strategic Housing Plan was funded by the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA), the same department that funded the navigation center, and that Lakewood could not even change the name of the product DOLA had paid for. How much of Lakewood’s policy does DOLA fund? Is accepting all this “free money” from DOLA leading Lakewood to take the steps the state wants, rather than the steps the local residents are asking for? Olver went on to explain that housing migrants in the schools would not happen because that requires a public process to rezone an abandoned school into a residential area. Just like operating a shelter requires a special use permit that requires a public process, unless there is a very good reason. In the case of the navigation center, the city planned for it to be used as an emergency shelter but didn’t get a permit because it was an “emergency”. Now the city has accepted a grant requiring the land to be used as a shelter so there is an argument that there the city cannot NOT approve a shelter permit, regardless of how many people show up during public process. Experiences like these may have been in the minds of the people laughing at the words “public process” during the meeting. Scorecard: Approve Lakewood Strategic Housing Plan Strom: Aye Shahrezaei: Aye Sinks: Aye Mayott-Guerrero: Aye Cruz: Aye Stewart: Aye Low: Aye Olver: Nay Rein: Aye LaBure: Aye Nystrom: Aye Read previous articles about the Strategic Housing Plan: Lakewood Strategic Housing Plan Update Residents Will Pay for Development Migrants and Housing Not Affordable: More Market-Rate Housing Coming to Lakewood Correction: Services, not shelter, to Move to Jeffco School

Save Belmar Park Call to Action

Community Organizer Regina Hopkins is asking for your attendance at the upcoming Lakewood Planning Commission Meeting DAY/DATE: Wednesday, Feb 21, 2024 TIME: 7:00PM LOCATION: 480 S. Allison Parkway (Lakewood City CouncilChambers) Click for AGENDA **URGENT CALL FOR ACTION** Your presence and voice are urgently needed at this week’s upcoming Planning Commission meeting. We ask all local community members to attend in person, as this is the only way you can verbally express your public comments. The meeting is scheduled for Wed.Feb. 21 at 7:00pm at 480 S. Allison Parkway (Lakewood City Council Chambers). Recent developments have brought to light profound concerns about the handling of certain processes within our community, notably concerning the proposed development at 777 S. Yarrow St. This development,which includes plans for a monster apartment building adjacent to Belmar Park and the bird sanctuary, has sparked alarm among residents. The current approach, largely driven by decisions made by staff without any public engagement process, has resulted in many community members feeling blind sided and voiceless in a decision that directly impacts our cherished crown jewel park. We have conveyed our concerns to City Council, and now we turn to the planning commissioners – who hold a pivotal role in zoning he land in our city, among other duties. The upcoming Planning Commission meeting will provide us with a crucial opportunity to voice our opinions,express our concerns, and advocate for a more transparent and inclusive process. During the meeting, each attendee will have 3 minutes to address the planning commissioners. This is our chance to articulate why we believe they play a vital role in reviewing unilateral decisions made by administrative staff for the entire Lakewood community. Planning commissioners serve as an essential part of the checks and balances process within our community, and we look to them for oversight and improvement. We’ve seen examples from other communities in Colorado where processes have been enhanced to be more inclusive and transparent. It’s time for Lakewood to follow suit. One of the primary topics of discussion will be the preservation of Belmar Park and the planning decisions surrounding 777 S.Yarrow St. Your presence and advocacy are critical in safeguarding this essential community asset. I urge each and every one of you to prioritize attending this important Planning Commission meeting. Together, we can ensure that our community’s concerns are heard and addressed, fostering a more inclusive and transparent decision-making process. Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter,and I look forward to seeing you at the meeting. Regina Director of Save Belmar Park

Resident Concerns Cause City to Change Tactics on Migrant Support

Hundreds of Lakewood residents raised concerns over supporting migrants and stopped City Council from taking immediate actions at the Council meeting on February 12.  The Council did not even have a discussion on migrant support after the City Manager provided her report on meeting with Denver. Previous Council meetings clearly suggested further discussion and action was anticipated so the abrupt absence substantiates the city’s “misinformation” campaign but does not explain why Council changed directions. Comments later in that meeting show that Lakewood will open city and city-connected non-profit homeless services to migrants. As a new way to support migrants, Lakewood Mayor Wendi Strom has signed Lakewood’s support to fast-tracking work authorizations. Media coverage of the February 12 meeting is listed below. The City Manager’s report of her discussion with Denver is available online. However, Council had previously promised a discussion at the February 12 meeting to decide what further actions they will take. Councilors Roger Low and Isabel Cruz stated that they hoped the City Manager’s report was only the first step.  “Quickly” was the buzzword the City Manager repeated. Not just listening quickly, but acting quickly. The lack of discussion following the executive report was notable not only because of this previous promise, but because it was apparently coordinated. Mayor Strom did not open the floor to comments and no Council Member tried to open a discussion at this time. Also notable was that six Council Members were wearing butterflies as a sign of solidarity with migrants. This visible support in combination with an apparent coordinated lack of discussion led two members of the public to wonder aloud whether there was any point to making public comment. Are Council Members listening with an open mind if they come in solidarity with a position? Migrant support was also discussed when the city approved funds to open a county-wide homeless shelter and support center, otherwise known as a navigation center. Denver’s failed homeless policies and influx of migrants have pushed Denver’s homeless into Lakewood. So by approving a new center, Lakewood is supporting Denver’s failed policies and two displaced populations. And as one public commenter said, Lakewood itself is adopting the same failed “housing first” strategy that Denver has tried. The navigation center was approved by a vote of 10-1. Scorecard: Approve Lakewood Navigation Center Strom: Aye Shahrezaei: Aye (wears butterfly) Sinks: Aye (wears butterfly) Mayott-Guerrero: Aye (wears butterfly) Cruz: Aye (wears butterfly) Stewart: Aye (wears butterfly) Low: Aye (wears butterfly) Olver: Nay Rein: Aye LaBure: Aye Nystrom: Aye Non-Profit Coordination Lakewood will continue to work with non-profits to “navigate”, or coordinate, migrant support. Council Member Sophia Mayott-Guerrero stated that “of course both the Housing Plan and the Navigation Center and any other social resource may in fact support people who have immigrated here.” Mayott-Guerrero has said that she herself volunteers with the Venezuelan migrant population. Many Lakewood residents seemed to be saying there is no “of course” about it. They want to stop enabling a population that may not have come here legally and they want Lakewood to have a discussion, not just assume there is only one way to do it. For example, Lakewood’s unofficial policy of migrant support is in stark contrast to cities like Colorado Springs which has declared itself NOT a sanctuary city. According to the Colorado Sun, Colorado Springs has seen approximately 24 migrant families compared to Denver’s 40,000 migrants. Lakewood residents driving popular intersections such as Colfax or Alameda and Sheridan will see migrants looking for work, suggesting Lakewood’s migrant numbers are already more than Colorado Springs, despite Colorado Springs being the larger city. What is bringing more homeless and migrants to Lakewood than to Colorado Springs? According to the Colorado Sun piece, the Springs and El Paso County are encouraging non-profits to NOT provide services to migrants because it is not compassionate to signal there are services available when that may not be financially feasible. The majority of Lakewood residents speaking against migrant support echoed this worry about financial resources, especially during a time when personal finances are stretched thin. Supporters of migrant support felt there was enough to go around, especially when federal funds kicked in to provide free money. The Navigation Center will not require an ID or any legal verification for service. Lakewood Encourages Fast-Tracking Work Authorizations Lakewood is not taking a backseat to providing migrant support. According to the Kim Monson Show, Lakewood Mayor Wendi Strom signed a letter of support from the Metro Mayors Caucus in support of three things: fast-tracked work permits, legal services and federal funding for migrants. This letter is not yet available. Media Coverage of the Meeting Lakewood, Colorado, residents urge city council not to help neighboring Denver with migrant crisis, by Lawrence Richard, Fox News Lakewood residents pack meeting about migrant rumors, FOX31 Denver Lakewood tries to dispel migrant rumors, 9News Lakewood residents are right to be skeptical about migrant agreement with Denver, Colorado Peak Politics Lakewood residents protest as Denver spends millions on new immigrants and tensions grow over what to do,  by Rachel Estabrook, CPR News Denver suburb residents outraged over migrant crisis, America’s Newsroom, FOX News

Recovery Works Secures Former Motel in Lakewood

According to the article below, Recovery Works has completed the purchase of a motel in Lakewood. The motel will be an additional Jefferson County shelter and service center for the unhoused. Recovery Works is the same organization that will be running the new Navigation Center in Lakewood. Lakewood Council will vote on appropriating funds for the project on February 12, 2024. Cross post from Mile High CRE IMPACT Commercial Real Estate has announced the recent sale of a former motel that will now serve as the future home for a nonprofit organization, Recovery Works. This was not only a significant milestone for the community but a testament that commercial properties can transform into something that will make a positive impact on the community as well.  The newly purchased 10,000-square-foot building is strategically located at 14825 W Colfax in Lakewood and will serve as a bridge center and resource for the unhoused in Jefferson County by referral. It will help people get back on their feet and find permanent housing for those in need. Recovery Works locations provide additional services, including meals, laundry capabilities and job programs for employment placement. Read more….

Council Abandons Required Public Study Sessions

Guest post from Jim Kinney Lakewood’s City Council’s established Core Community Values, and Commitment to Citizens, which are both found on Lakewood.org, which include commitment to transparent government, open and honest communication and a commitment to provide education and information.  City Council, which includes the Mayor, has also committed itself to focusing on quality results, promoting an inclusive environment for all citizens, respecting the traditions of the community, and honoring Lakewood’s neighborhoods’ values. City Council’s Policy and Procedures Manual (also found at Lakewood.org), approved on May 14, 2018, contains the official policies and procedures City Council (Council) has developed and approved for themselves, to which their duties, proceedings, meetings and conduct all must conform.  The authority for the Council Policy and Procedures Manual comes from the City of Lakewood Home Rule Charter and the Council’s approval of their Policy and Procedures Manual (Manual). Manual, Section 05.16, establishes official Council policy and procedures for Study Sessions.  Study Sessions are a regular event conducted to familiarize the Council and the public with detailed information and aspects of subjects under consideration in advance of the date the subject is to be before Council on the regular Council meeting agenda.  Study Sessions are scheduled to be held on the first and third Mondays of each month, to facilitate coordinated study of subjects in preparation for upcoming regular Council meetings, which are scheduled for the second and fourth Mondays of each month. The public may comment at Study Sessions and their comments add to the overall value of information presented and collected at a Study Session. A public comment period follows each presentation within a Study Session, prior to Council discussion. Council Study Sessions create the opportunity to present, question, understand, analyze, discuss and debate broad and detailed information, aspects and options associated with the subject, all the while allowing invaluable communication among Council, City staff and the public to occur. Participation in Study Sessions allows Council an opportunity and means to fulfill their Commitment to Citizens and focus on their Core Community Values, which were briefly introduced in the first paragraph. Unfortunately, a disturbing and harmful trend has developed in City governance concerning the required use of Study Sessions in Council proceedings. Council chose to cancel a significant number of Study Sessions throughout 2023, and that trend of cancellations of Study Sessions is continuing in 2024.  Holding Study Sessions, usually on both the first and third Mondays of the month, is required policy and procedure for Council.  Failure to conduct Study Sessions deprives City Council and the public of the necessary information, facts, perspectives, and a means of quality preparation necessary to make the best decisions for the Community on issues coming before Council for consideration and decision making.  The Council and the entire Lakewood community benefits from presentations and discussions during each Study Sessions.  Council must ensure the scheduling and conduct of valuable, high quality Study Sessions, as they have required of themselves, for good reason, in their Council Manual. Reader Recommended Business: Karen M Sweat, Certified Public Accountant

Public Comment Moved To After Council Votes

Mayor Wendi Strom has changed the timing of public comment. In the name of efficiency, Strom has moved comment from the beginning until later in the meeting. Originally, public comment was moved to after the consent agenda. Now, there is no public comment until all business has been concluded. You can voice your opinion after Council has voted. In this case, efficiency may seem like shutting down the voices of the public. Are there other efficiencies being achieved? The agenda for Monday, February 12 is shown below with notations for topics that will bring changes to Lakewood that have been in the news recently. Public Comment online is available until noon, February 12. To comment, go to the meeting agenda page and click on the item you wish to speak about. There will be a “Comment on this item” button. If there is no Comment button, Council is not accepting comment on that item particularly (for example, Mayor and Council Reports in the picture below). Anything on those items will go in “Public Comment”, while “City Navigation Center” has its own comment section. Sidenote: Lakewood City Councilors expressed satisfaction during the January 8 meeting that there were 50 comments supporting migrant assistance. In point of fact, many of those comments were supporting revisions to the Yarrow St development plan. Recently, Lakewood Informer conducted a survey that showed residents were not in favor of the migrant assistance or the current plans for the homeless shelter. The survey had 4 times as many respondents as the public comment but is still not representative of Lakewood as a whole. 100 survey respondents were used as the basis of adopting building codes. (for more, see Opinion: Your Views Matter When They Agree With the City)

Scroll to top